Peer-review
ETFLIN journals follow efficient, double-blind peer review guided by COPE Ethical Guidelines.
Core Principles
Timeline
Standard review within 14 business days. Prompt communication is required for any delays.
Anonymity
Double-blind protocol. No communication between reviewers and authors is permitted.
Affiliation Policy
Reviewers must have different affiliations from authors and each other to minimize conflicts and ensure diverse, independent perspectives.
Expertise Criteria
- • Advanced Degree (Ph.D., MD, or equivalent)
- • Proven publication record in reputable journals
- • Active practical or academic field experience
Review Workflow
Preparation
Anonymization & watermark application.
Invitation
5-day response window for referees.
Peer-Review Submission
Comments, scores & recommendation.
Assessment
1–7 days for Editor decision.
Revision
Author improvements or second round.
Review Assessment Points
Language & Style
Research Background
Methodology
Results & Discussion
Conclusion
References
Scoring Legend
Reviewer Recognition
- Certificate of Recognition
- Named Recognition in Articles
- Priority Submission Status
Strictly Prohibited Activities
Personal References
Suggesting citations that don't enhance content quality.
Author Contact
Intentional or unintentional direct contact with authors.
Manipulating Review
Biasing outcomes for personal or institutional interests.
Unethical Comments
Discriminative, disrespectful, or non-constructive feedback.
For further questions, contact the Editorial Office via halo@etflin.com.